Re: plperl returning setof foo[]

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl returning setof foo[]
Date: 2009-09-12 23:10:44
Message-ID: 4AAC2A74.6090800@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>> Nobody has complained about it over the years, so I wonder if it should
>> be backpatched. It wouldn't change any working behaviour, just remove
>> the non-working property of some documented behaviour.
>>
>
> AFAICT it just fails, so backpatching seems like a bug fix not a
> behavioral change.
>
>
>

OK. will fix.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Mielke 2009-09-12 23:12:05 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system.
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-09-12 22:54:39 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types