Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Mike Ellsworth <younicycle(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SEO
Date: 2009-09-05 13:23:01
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Hmm, it would be good if somebody who knows more about it than me
>> could confirm this, but it looks like the sitemap needs to contain
>> *every URL in the docs* to be effective. The one we have now just
>> contains the root path of each version, but it seems it doesn't apply
>> to subpages?
> That's what the customer we have who knows SEO very well does: they
> even generate several sitemaps as they have too much pages for one
> sitemap.

so we would have to include all urls in the docs to make it effective?

> Note that the google webmaster tools let you upload sitemaps directly
> so that you can check they are well formed and taken into account.

well it is well formed though I guess google cannot magically guess on 
what we really want to get as a result :)


In response to

  • Re: SEO at 2009-09-05 10:08:39 from Guillaume Smet


  • Re: SEO at 2009-09-05 13:45:30 from Guillaume Smet

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Guillaume SmetDate: 2009-09-05 13:45:30
Subject: Re: SEO
Previous:From: Guillaume SmetDate: 2009-09-05 10:08:39
Subject: Re: SEO

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group