| From: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Mike Ellsworth <younicycle(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SEO |
| Date: | 2009-09-05 10:08:39 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10909050308q11a6f483w749b244f0fcffdb5@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Hmm, it would be good if somebody who knows more about it than me
> could confirm this, but it looks like the sitemap needs to contain
> *every URL in the docs* to be effective. The one we have now just
> contains the root path of each version, but it seems it doesn't apply
> to subpages?
That's what the customer we have who knows SEO very well does: they
even generate several sitemaps as they have too much pages for one
sitemap.
Note that the google webmaster tools let you upload sitemaps directly
so that you can check they are well formed and taken into account.
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2009-09-05 13:23:01 | Re: SEO |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-09-05 09:57:38 | Re: SEO |