Re: \d+ for long view definitions?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: \d+ for long view definitions?
Date: 2009-09-01 17:31:21
Message-ID: 4A9D5A69.8090007@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/31/09 1:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I guess my premise is that if I use \d, I'm primarily interested in the
> column names and types. The view definition is secondary. If the view
> definition is a single line or uses a single table, it's interesting
> because it might describe something about the schema design, but if it's
> 20 lines it's an implementation detail.

I agree with Peter here.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-01 18:10:24 Re: remove flatfiles.c
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-09-01 17:07:07 Re: remove flatfiles.c