From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: MySQL Compatibility WAS: 8.5 release timetable, again |
Date: | 2009-08-27 10:07:12 |
Message-ID: | 4A965AD0.60605@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane írta:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>
>> Actually it always bothered me that we don't have implicit casts from
>> integer->boolean. I can't see any ambiguity or unintentional effects
>> this would cause problems with. Am I missing something?
>>
>
> Personally, as an old Pascal-lover, I always thought that C's failure
> to distinguish between int and boolean was the single biggest design
> mistake in the language.
On the other hand, the first two programming languages I have learnt
was Sinclair ZX Spectrum BASIC and Z80 assembly,
I welcomed C being so near to assembly... :-)
> I'm very glad that SQL doesn't make that
> mistake, and I don't want to go against the standard to introduce it.
>
In that we agree. SQL is not C.
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
Bible has answers for everything. Proof:
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more
than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology.
"May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-08-27 10:42:49 | Re: Build system problem in 8.3.x |
Previous Message | Jean-Michel Pouré | 2009-08-27 10:00:01 | Re: MySQL Compatibility WAS: postgresql.conf settings autoconfiguration |