Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts
Date: 2009-08-25 21:23:17
Message-ID: 4A945645.9010705@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> But in
> any case, it (intentionally) doesn't wait for the postmaster to be ready
> to accept connections, so it's not solving Kevin's problem.
>
>
>

Maybe we need a --wait mode for "pg_ctl status" that would test
connecting to the database the same way it does on start/restart.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-08-25 21:26:11 Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-08-25 20:47:28 Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts