Re: FDW-based dblink (WIP)

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FDW-based dblink (WIP)
Date: 2009-08-20 06:14:20
Message-ID: 4A8CE9BC.4080802@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> However, automatic transaction management needs help by core. Is it
> acceptable to have two-phase callbacks?

Probably, but it's far too early to decide what the interface should
look like.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-08-20 08:47:20 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-08-20 05:55:45 Re: hot standby - merged up to CVS HEAD