Re: Alpha releases: How to tag

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Alpha releases: How to tag
Date: 2009-08-03 12:06:23
Message-ID: 4A76D2BF.30506@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> As we are approaching the first alpha release, let's think about how to tag
> and label it and how to schedule those two operations with respect to one
> another.
>
> The typical process for, say, a beta release is
>
> - apply version number change to source tree
> - commit
> - tag
> (repeat for next beta)
>
> The problem, arguably, with this is that the source tree would then read
> 8.5alpha1 until alpha2, instead of the 8.5devel that we are used to. The fix
> could be:
>
> - apply version number change to source tree
> - commit
> - tag
> - revert version number change in source tree
> - commit
> (repeat for next alpha)
>
> or more sophisticatedly
>
> - branch
> - apply version number change to source tree
> - commit
> - tag
>
> or alternatively no tag at all, just apply version number and build tarball.
>
> Comments?
>
>

Does it need a version number change? Maybe just a tag (no branch) is
all that is required.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wader2 2009-08-03 12:18:02 BUG #4961: pg_standby.exe crashes with no args
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2009-08-03 11:57:14 Re: Alpha releases: How to tag