Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> To performance test this properly you might need to devise a test > that will use a sufficiently different order of queueing items to > show the difference.
It would appear that I need help with devising a proper test. So far, all tests have shown no difference in performance based on the patch; I get almost twice the speed as a single job running in one database transaction either way. Can someone explain what I should try to set up to get a "best case" and a "worst case" for the patch? Our production databases don't expose any difference, but I'm willing to try to use them to "seed" an artificial case which will.