| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: stable snapshots... |
| Date: | 2009-07-16 06:22:09 |
| Message-ID: | 4A5EC711.3090605@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>> Ummmmm ... you didn't break things, did you? Specifically as far as old
>> builds are concerned?? There is a reason why we have an older flex on
>> that machine :(
>
> It should be all right to update svr1 to something more recent. We know
> that flex 2.5.33 or .35 will work for all supported release branches;
> people (and the buildfarm in particular) have been testing that for a
> long time.
I didn't actually replace the old flex - I just installed a newer one
from ports in addition to the still existing one from the OS. Only the
snapshot generation script for -HEAD got modified to actually look for
that specific flex version.
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | webmaster | 2009-07-16 14:00:00 | PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-7-16 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-15 22:59:25 | Re: stable snapshots... |