Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Date: 2009-07-13 15:34:09
Message-ID: 4A5B0DA10200002500028711@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Now this disappears into the noise as soon as you include parse
> analysis (let alone planning and execution)

No need to go for silly options to avoid a performance issue at that
level. Time wasted dealing with subsequent silliness would almost
certainly have a higher "lost opportunity" cost regarding things that
matter more.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-07-13 15:54:28 Re: (No) Autocast in 8.4 with operators "=" and "LIKE"
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-07-13 15:32:22 Re: Index-only-scans, indexam API changes