Re: Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby
Date: 2009-07-07 11:46:57
Message-ID: 4A5335B1.60704@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> While supporting multiple slaves
> isn't a priority,
>

Really? I should have thought it was a basic requirement. At the very
least we need to design with it in mind.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2009-07-07 11:51:27 Re: Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-07-07 11:21:17 Re: Maintenance Policy?