Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alan Li <ali(at)truviso(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
Date: 2009-06-22 14:47:13
Message-ID: 4A3F9971.3010603@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I thought he was asking for a solution to the problem of WALInsertLock
> contention. In any case, we have "WAL bypass on a table by table basis"
> now, don't we?
>
>
>

If we do I'm ignorant of it ;-) How do we say "Never WAL this table"?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-22 14:51:20 Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-06-22 14:27:17 Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?