Re: very slow selects on a small table

From: Brian Cox <brian(dot)cox(at)ca(dot)com>
To: "Grzegorz Jakiewicz [gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com]" <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane [tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: very slow selects on a small table
Date: 2009-06-18 17:16:51
Message-ID: 4A3A7683.9060100@ca.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Grzegorz Jakiewicz [gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com] wrote:
> this might be quite bogus question, just a hit - but what is your
> work_mem set to ?
> Guys, isn't postgresql giving hudge cost, when it can't sort in memory ?
work_mem = 64MB

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2009-06-18 17:21:03 Re: very slow selects on a small table
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2009-06-18 17:12:32 Re: very slow selects on a small table