Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk(at)ozlabs(dot)org>, "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen
Date: 2009-06-16 06:12:18
Message-ID: 4A3737C2.8090401@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> The advice in Stephen's email is also very good - in particular,
> whatever you come up with, you should submit performance results.
> Note that while --enable-profiling is very useful and profiling
> numbers are good to submit, you'll also want to make sure you do a
> build that is optimized for speed (i.e. no profiling, no casserts, no
> debug) and do timings on that.

I'm particularly interested to see how much the patch hurts performance
in the cases where it's not helping.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2009-06-16 06:13:43 Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby
Previous Message dror 2009-06-16 06:02:16 Re: How to embed postgresql?