Re: [Fwd: Re: dblink patches for comment]

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: dblink patches for comment]
Date: 2009-06-06 19:23:31
Message-ID: 4A2AC233.90503@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>> OK, got it. I think the attached is what you're looking for, although I
>> have not yet tested beyond "it compiles" and "it passes make installcheck".
>
> You're making it vastly overcomplicated. Just do something like
>
> for (cp = str; *cp; cp++)
> {
> if (*cp == '\\' || *cp == '\'')
> AppendStringInfoChar(buf, '\\');
> AppendStringInfoChar(buf, *cp);
> }
>
> Since you're working in a server-safe encoding, there is no need to
> worry about multibyte characters --- the tests will never match
> any byte of a multibyte char.

It wasn't clear to me that would be safe, but thanks for your patience :-)

This version is clearly simpler. For the record I've included the doc
patch again here. Will commit shortly...

Joe

Attachment Content-Type Size
dblink.2009.06.06.02-sqlmed.diff text/x-patch 8.3 KB
dblink.2009.06.02.02-sqlmed_doc.diff text/x-patch 3.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-06 19:44:50 Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-06-06 19:06:30 Re: Revisiting default_statistics_target