Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com> wrote:
> If you wake up 10,000 threads, and they all can get significant work
> done before yielding no matter what order they run, the system will
> scale extremely well.
But with roughly twice the average response time you would get
throttling active requests to the minimum needed to keep all resources
busy. (Admittedly a hard point to find with precision.)
> I would think that the 4 or 5 most important locks or concurrency
> coordination points in Postgres have very specific, unique
> properties.
Given the wide variety of uses I'd be cautious about such assumptions.
> In particular, these are interesting references, (not only for
java):
With this wealth of opinion, perhaps they can soon approach IBM's JVM
in their ability to support a large number of threads. I'm rooting
for them.
-Kevin