Re: search_path vs extensions

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions
Date: 2009-05-28 08:08:50
Message-ID: 4A1E4692.3000907@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> "we all agree that a specific pg_extension schema is a good idea, as
> soon as user is free not to use it at extension install time".
>
>

I don't think we all agree on that at all. ;-)

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-05-28 08:13:05 Re: search_path vs extensions
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-05-28 07:36:44 Re: search_path vs extensions