| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jörg Kiegeland <kiegeland(at)ikv(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: unconfirmed bug #4784 |
| Date: | 2009-05-11 08:58:21 |
| Message-ID: | 4A07E8AD.7030009@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Jörg Kiegeland wrote:
> Hi,
> Approx. 2 weeks ago, I posted a bug which got the ID 4784. However I got
> no response to it, and it not occurs in the mbox of April or May.
> This bug is quite important to us, since it was reported by our
> customer. So I would like to know if this bug is still being checked /
> on a waiting list to be checked,
> or if it is somehow lost.
Hi,
since it's not available in the archives, it appears not to have been
delivered to the lists. My bet is that it got caught in the spamfilter
(the traffic from the bug report form goes to a standard mailinglist, so
it's subject to the same antispam as other posts). We did have some
issues with the spamfilter a couple of weeks ago, so it may have been
lost then.
Please resubmit the bugreport.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Johansson | 2009-05-11 14:48:10 | Is this the expected behaviour for DDL-query execution? |
| Previous Message | Jörg Kiegeland | 2009-05-11 08:20:12 | unconfirmed bug #4784 |