| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Remote access |
| Date: | 2009-05-08 14:36:52 |
| Message-ID: | 4A044384.9030507@postnewspapers.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
A. Kretschmer wrote:
> There are some ways to do that, for instance a so called SSH-Tunnel,
> read http://docs.planetargon.com/PostgreSQL_SSH_Tunnel
SSH tunneling transports TCP over a TCP encapsulation. The adaptive rate
control may not work how you'd expect; I've had some odd issues with SSH
tunnels in the past that've turned out to be caused by TCP rate control
issues.
In any case, a MUCH better option in almost all cases will be SSL,
possibly with client certificates.
--
Craig Ringer
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | George Weaver | 2009-05-08 14:37:19 | Re: Remote access |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-05-08 14:27:25 | Re: prepared statements and DBD::Pg |