On 08.08.25 22:30, Andres Freund wrote:
> One thing that would be an interesting follow-up would be to make the struct
> not just carry the datum, but also the type of the field, to be filled in by
> tuple deforming and the *GetDatum() functions. Then we could assert that the
> correct DatumGet*() functions are used. I think that'd allow us to detect a
> rather large number of issues that we currently aren't finding
That would make Datum >=9 bytes? Is that something we would need to
worry about in terms of performance?