Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Date: 2009-04-21 16:45:19
Message-ID: 49EDB1CF.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> \df[antw][S+] list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions
>
> (one line only, removing the second redundant line). This seems
> clea[nr]er to me. Bruce says it would confuse users.

That's clear to me, anyway (if you include PATTERN). I'd be fine with
it or the alternative I posted.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2009-04-21 16:45:33 Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format
Previous Message vacuum 2009-04-21 16:42:39 Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax