Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt
Date: 2009-04-20 14:32:24
Message-ID: 49EC8778.8080900@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> Patch also changes the default from "prefer" to "disable", per discussion.
>
> I confess to not having paid attention to this thread for awhile.
> I have to violently object to this conclusion --- it is throwing the
> baby out with the bathwater. Under the pretense of being "secure by
> default" it will in fact make things *less* secure. A minimum
> requirement in my view is that existing configurations should continue
> to work and be no less secure than before. Having a connection that
> was encrypted in 8.3 silently become clear-text after installing 8.4
> is just plain NOT acceptable.
>
> I think the patch would be fine if we simply keep the default where
> it is, however. Is there some point I am missing that compels
> selection of a less-secure default?

The current default *makes no sense*. Ever. Not just as a default.

However, I can see us having "allow" instead of "disable" as the
default. That is the most forgiving of all settings - it will work with
whatever you had configured before.

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-20 14:54:21 Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-20 14:26:58 Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt