Re: [PATCH] unalias of ACL_SELECT_FOR_UPDATE

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unalias of ACL_SELECT_FOR_UPDATE
Date: 2009-04-19 07:41:26
Message-ID: 49EAD5A6.4010601@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> However, ACL_UPDATE and ACL_SELECT_FOR_UPDATE internally shares same bit
> so SE-PostgreSQL cannot discriminate between UPDATE and SELECT FOR UPDATE
> or SHARE.

Why should it discriminate between them?

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-04-19 08:21:42 Re: [PATCH] unalias of ACL_SELECT_FOR_UPDATE
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-04-19 07:38:54 Re: 8.4b1: Query returning results in different order to 8.3