| From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf |
| Date: | 2009-03-30 14:59:04 |
| Message-ID: | 49D0DE38.10306@esilo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> It sounds like everyone has converged on agreeing that this way is okay
>>> for 8.4? Object now or hold your peace ...
>
>> What are we doing with PQinitSSL()?
>
> Nothing, except improving the documentation.
>
>
My patch didn't change the docs at all. I wasn't sure what to do there.
However, I did change the implementation but left behavior alone. It
now calls PQinitSecure(do_init, do_init);
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-03-30 14:59:05 | Re: Partitioning feature ... |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-03-30 14:57:57 | Re: psql \d* and system objects |