Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Date: 2009-03-22 14:42:58
Message-ID: 49C64E72.1080703@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
>
> I think using PACKAGE is a bad idea as it'll confuse people used to
> Oracle. MODULE perhaps?
>
>

Right. We debated this extensively in the past. Module was the consensus
name.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-03-22 14:59:15 Re: typedefs for indent
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-03-22 13:48:02 Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues