Re: evtcache: EventTriggerCache vs Event Trigger Cache

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: evtcache: EventTriggerCache vs Event Trigger Cache
Date: 2023-07-05 07:18:44
Message-ID: 49C5774E-7552-4D83-B3A5-E97095A26120@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 8 May 2023, at 10:39, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>> On 4 May 2023, at 14:18, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>>> On 4 May 2023, at 14:09, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>>> How about naming
>>> the hash "EventTriggerCacheHash" or so?
>>
>> I think the level is the indicator here, but I have no strong opinions,
>> EventTriggerCacheHash is fine by me.
>
> The attached trivial diff does that, parking this in the next CF.

Pushed, thanks!

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-07-05 07:37:27 Re: Wrong syntax in feature description
Previous Message John Naylor 2023-07-05 07:11:02 Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.