Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?

From: Ashish Karalkar <ashishka(at)synechron(dot)com>
To: Jennifer Trey <jennifer(dot)trey(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?
Date: 2009-03-18 05:49:34
Message-ID: 49C08B6E.40300@synechron.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 18:23 +0100, Jennifer Trey wrote:
>
>> Which one should one install? Is there any difference?
>>
>>
>> They are both free right? And both has fulltext support, right?
>>
>>
>
> It depends on your requirements. I always suggest using a version that
> natively supports your operating system packaging. As far as I know
> Postgres Plus does not do this on Linux.
>
> If you are running windows, use what you want :)
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
>> Jen
>>
>>

Postgres Plus does support Linux and it includes all the PostgreSQL
features as well as have many other additional useful features.One of
which is its dyna tune module.
You can check through the webpage
http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/postgres_plus.do for detail
additional features.
I am using it on Linux and so far haven't faced any problem :-)

With Regards
--Ashish

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Subha Ramakrishnan 2009-03-18 05:58:08 Re: Uploading data to postgresql database
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-03-18 05:46:21 Re: postmaster never finishes starting up, silent to boot