Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4

From: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: 2009-03-17 13:18:11
Message-ID: 49BFA313.8040500@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 22:20 -0400, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
>
>
>> A tunable does not impact existing behavior
>>
>
> Why not put the tunable parameter into the patch and then show the test
> results with it in? If there is no overhead, we should then be able to
> see that.
>
>
Can do? Though will need quick primer on adding tunables.
Is it on wiki.postgresql.org anywhere?

-Jignesh

--
Jignesh Shah http://blogs.sun.com/jkshah
The New Sun Microsystems,Inc http://sun.com/postgresql

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message luo roger 2009-03-17 15:59:52 Confused ! when insert with Preimary key, Freebsd 7.1 is slower thrice times then Debian5
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-03-17 05:45:41 Re: deployment query