Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: 2009-03-16 17:39:58
Message-ID: 1237225198.3963.60.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 22:20 -0400, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:

> A tunable does not impact existing behavior

Why not put the tunable parameter into the patch and then show the test
results with it in? If there is no overhead, we should then be able to
see that.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nagalingam, Karthikeyan 2009-03-16 18:17:58 Re: deployment query
Previous Message John R Pierce 2009-03-16 17:38:05 Re: deployment query