| From: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Subject: | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1710) |
| Date: | 2009-03-11 09:17:18 |
| Message-ID: | 49B7819E.2000101@kaigai.gr.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> * ACL_SELECT_FOR_UPDATE has same value with ACL_UPDATE, so SE-PostgreSQL
>> checks db_table:{update} permission on SELECT ... FOR SHARE OF,
>> instead of db_table:{lock} permission.
>
> This again falls into the category of trying to have more fine-grained
> permissions than vanilla PostgreSQL has. Just give up on the lock
> permission, and let it check update permission instead. Yes, it can be
> annoying that you need update-permission to do SELECT FOR SHARE, but
> that's an existing problem and not in scope for this patch.
Can I consider the term of "problem" means it can be resolved
in the future (v8.5, if possible) version?
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-03-11 09:25:31 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1710) |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-03-11 08:44:10 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1710) |