| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |
| Date: | 2009-03-09 19:56:02 |
| Message-ID: | 49B57452.2030304@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>>> but maybe it's better to use -i and -I, and thus change them both?
>>>
>
>
>> That's already used:
>>
>
>
>> -i, --ignore-version proceed even when server version mismatches
>> pg_dump version
>>
>
> Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely.
> Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts".
>
>
>
+1. I was just thinking the same thing.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-03-09 20:02:01 | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-09 19:48:36 | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |