| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |
| Date: | 2009-02-26 07:30:30 |
| Message-ID: | 49A64516.8080007@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Agreed. Simon has finished the pending items he had four weeks ago,
>> but the code clearly isn't ready for commit yet as new issues are
>> cropping up. And I think the way subtransactions are handled, which
>> has been a difficult part of the patch all along, still needs more
>> thinking.
>
> Are there issues other than subtransactions?
Subtransactions, and transaction tracking in general. I haven't looked
at the other parts in detail yet.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-02-26 08:04:38 | Re: Hot standby, recovery procs |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-02-26 07:09:38 | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |