| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |
| Date: | 2009-02-25 20:45:18 |
| Message-ID: | 49A5ADDE.5050301@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> I think the more relevant question right now is whether the work Fujii
> Masao is planning to do for 8.5 is reponsive to the following comment
> from Heikki:
>
> # IMHO, the synchronous replication isn't in such good shape, I'm
> afraid. I've said
> # this before, but I'm not happy with the "built from spare parts"
> nature of it. You
> # shouldn't have to configure an archive, file-based log shipping using rsync or
> # whatever, and pg_standby. All that is in addition to the direct
> connection between
> # master and slave. The slave really should be able to just connect to
> the master, and
> # download all the WAL it needs directly. That's a huge usability
> issue if left as is,
> # but requires very large architectural changes to fix.
I believe so, see second bullet point in:
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-02-25 21:03:44 | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-02-25 20:39:55 | Hot standby, running xacts, subtransactions |