Re: pg_restore --multi-thread

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Joshua D. Drake a écrit :
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 11:47 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 11:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
>>>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> The implementation is actually different across platforms: on Windows
>>>>> the workers are genuine threads, while elsewhere they are forked
>>>>> children in the same fashion as the backend (non-EXEC_BACKEND case). In
>>>>> either case, the program will use up to NUM concurrent connections to
>>>>> the server.
>>>>>
>>>> How about calling it --num-connections or something like that? I agree
>>>> with Peter that "thread" is not the best terminology on platforms where
>>>> there is no threading involved.
>>>>
>>> --num-workers or --num-connections would both work.
>>>
>>>
>> *shrug* whatever. What should the short option be (if any?). -n is
>> taken, so -N ?
>
> Works for me.

is -j already affected ?

>
>> cheers
>>
>> andrew
>>

- --
Cédric Villemain
Administrateur de Base de Données
Cel: +33 (0)6 74 15 56 53
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmUcvUACgkQo/dppWjpEvzT5gCg44yo8CbfT3AAevzbPXphqu3K
oeUAnAy6/epLlwe7DWWneIB8XVeDIu/+
=Q8iq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----