| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
| Date: | 2005-10-07 15:56:50 |
| Message-ID: | 4990.1128700610@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> Also they
>> don't need to modify
>> scripts, can't they just write thier own pg_cacnel_backend to
>> return int
>> based on the boolean version?
> No, because you can't overload based purely on return type. I suppose
> they could write it to take an int8 pid or something, but that's a hack.
Well, how many people want to vote for Andreas' suggestion of having
both
int pg_cancel_backend(int)
bool pg_backend_cancel(int)
with the former deprecated but still there for backward compatibility?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-07 15:59:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-07 15:50:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open |