Re: parallel restore

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore
Date: 2009-01-31 15:46:24
Message-ID: 49847250.2010001@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Okay, another question --- there are two places in pg_backup_custom.c
>> where the patch #ifdef's out hasSeek tests on WIN32. Why is that?
>> If checkSeek() is wrong on Windows, wouldn't it be better to fix it?
>>
>
> Oh, dear. That's a hangover from before that got fixed earlier this
> month. checkSeek() should now work. I will make sure it does and let
> you know.
>
>

Here is a new patch.

Changes:

* above #ifdefs removed
* fixed declaration of DeClone()
* brought up to date with CVS.

successfully tested on Windows.

cheers

andrew

Attachment Content-Type Size
parallel_restore_16.patch.gz application/x-gzip 18.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-01-31 16:27:35 Re: mingw check hung
Previous Message Hiroshi Saito 2009-01-31 15:44:37 Re: mingw check hung