Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Luis Neves <luis(dot)neves(at)co(dot)sapo(dot)pt>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-01-31 13:39:20
Message-ID: 49845488.7040204@co.sapo.pt
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Gregory Stark wrote:
> I'm putting together a talk on "PostgreSQL Pet Peeves" for discussion at
> FOSDEM 2009 this year. I have a pretty good idea what some them are of course,
> but I would be interested to hear if people have any complaints from personal
> experience. What would be most interesting is if you can explain an example of
> when the problem caused real inconvenience to you, since sometimes it's hard
> to see from a theoretical description where the real harm lies.
>
> So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it do some
> things which rub you the wrong way?
>
> Feel free to respond on-list or if you prefer in personal emails. I do intend
> to use the ideas you give in my presentation so mark anything you wouldn't be
> happy to see in a slide at a conference some day.
>

A few from the top of my head:

- COPY command does not support collation. It's such a pita to massage
huge files that have "," has a decimal separator.
- COPY command does not have a "DO NOT ABORT ON ERROR". I do not mean
constraint checking, I mean that the occasional backslash characters or
rows with a badly encoded characters should not abort the import process.
- No automatic CLUSTERing.
- EXPLAIN does not work with functions.

--
Luis Neves

In response to

  • Pet Peeves? at 2009-01-29 13:16:17 from Gregory Stark

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2009-01-31 14:28:31 Re: Pet Peeves?
Previous Message Gerhard Heift 2009-01-31 13:03:12 Returning old value on update