| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pet Peeves? |
| Date: | 2009-01-30 13:26:45 |
| Message-ID: | 49830015.8070604@gmx.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Gregory Stark wrote:
> So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it do some
> things which rub you the wrong way?
* No offer of anything-but-CVS on pgfoundry.org
* Lack of REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
* Too many obscure configuration options: memory management, autovacuum
management, freespace map, background writer, WAL.
* Writing robust scripts with psql is difficult and bizarre.
* Default postgresql.conf is too long and verbose.
* Default logging configuration is too minimal.
* Difficult to trace nested things, e.g., nested PL/pgSQL calls,
cascaded foreign key actions.
* No basic health checking: Answering the question, "Is this system
configured reasonably and running smoothly" takes two days of training
and half a day of work.
* Too much accumulated historical garbage that is never cleared out.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Verite | 2009-01-30 13:32:00 | Re: Pet Peeves? |
| Previous Message | Sean Davis | 2009-01-30 13:02:20 | Re: [INTERFACES] PGSQL and Javascript |