| From: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: duplicated tables |
| Date: | 2009-01-24 13:44:55 |
| Message-ID: | 497B1B57.7080705@timbira.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Teodor Sigaev escreveu:
>> That doesn't look like duplicated tables so much as duplicated
>> pg_namespace rows --- try doing \d's query by hand and adding display
>> of pg_class.ctid and pg_namespace.ctid. However, if that theory is
>> correct then the next question is what you were doing to pg_namespace...
>
> The bug was dereferencing uninitialized pointer, and postgres dumps core
> immediately. And patch does nothing with namespace.
>
Could you post a backtrace or a test case? Maybe it is worth adding an assert
or test at some point in the code.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-01-24 13:51:35 | Re: Pluggable Indexes |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-01-24 12:15:19 | Re: Hot Standby (v9d) |