Re: Set notice receiver before libpq connection startup

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Set notice receiver before libpq connection startup
Date: 2026-05-28 05:46:45
Message-ID: 4974E7EE-5E95-456E-B79F-B26F4D7339E5@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On May 28, 2026, at 13:22, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 9:40 AM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> The committed patch violates the .gitattributes whitespace rules:
>>>
>>> git show --check 06a5c3cdef02
>>>
>>> contrib/postgres_fdw/connection.c:651: indent with spaces.
>>> + /* expand_dbname = */ false);
>>>
>>> It is unfortunate that pgindent produces this layout that contradicts the git configuration. (The current formatting also doesn't look like what I would produce in an editor, so I think git is right here.)
>>>
>>> Maybe we could reformat this slightly to avoid that? (unless someone wants to try to fix pgindent)
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
>
>> Ah, I was not aware of the whitespace rule. I think it was not pgindent; I made that change manually. I added “=” because I thought it might read more fluently.
>>
>> Attached is a fix for that.
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> I suspect the whitespace issue was caused by pgindent that I ran
> before committing the patch.
>
> - /* expand_dbname = */ false);
> + false /* expand_dbname */ );
>
> I think "/* expand_dbname = */ false" looks better. libpqwalreceiver.c
> also uses that comment style. So how about the attached v2 patch, which
> reformats the comment accordingly?
>
> After applying the v2 patch, I confirmed that neither "git show --check ..."
> nor pgindent reports any issues.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fujii Masao
> <v2-0001-Fix-an-indentation-problem-in-postgres_fdw-connec.patch>

Oh, I misunderstood the problem. Nice to learn a new thing, I never knew git show check before. Yes, v2 passed “git show --check d359d02a238”.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ayush Tiwari 2026-05-28 06:01:16 pg_rewind: Skip vanished source files during traversal
Previous Message Shinya Kato 2026-05-28 05:34:54 Re: Report oldest xmin source when autovacuum cannot remove tuples