Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Date: 2009-01-19 17:17:14
Message-ID: 4974B59A.1080302@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> I notice you added a fillfactor reloption in ginoptions, but does it
> really make sense? I recall removing it because the original code
> contained a comment that says "this is here because default_reloptions
> wants it, but it has no effect".

I didn't change a recognition of fillfactor value, although GIN doesn't use it
for now.

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-01-19 17:19:33 Re: Fixes for compiler warnings
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2009-01-19 17:15:23 Re: Review: B-Tree emulation for GIN

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-01-19 17:20:19 Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-01-19 17:13:18 Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements