Re: Hot standby, RestoreBkpBlocks and cleanup locks

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby, RestoreBkpBlocks and cleanup locks
Date: 2009-01-09 17:34:01
Message-ID: 49678A89.5000107@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 18:30 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> How about we refactor things?
>
> Was that a patch against HEAD or a patch on patch?

Against HEAD.

> It would be useful to nibble away at the patch, committing all the
> necessary refactorings to make the patch work. That will reduce size of
> eventual commit.

Agreed. This in particular is a change I feel pretty confident to commit
beforehand.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-01-09 17:38:09 Maintaining patchset with GIT (was Re: Hot standby, RestoreBkpBlocks and cleanup locks)
Previous Message Aidan Van Dyk 2009-01-09 17:29:38 Re: Improving compressibility of WAL files