Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?
Date: 2021-10-10 12:51:38
Message-ID: 495cf2e2-6c76-0122-d15c-d271bf490ca4@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08.10.21 00:40, Tom Lane wrote:
> As far as that goes, I thought we had a policy against auto-detecting
> user-visible features. From memory, the rationale goes like "if you
> want feature X you should say so, so that the build will fail if we
> can't provide it". Thus we make you say something like --with-openssl
> even though it wouldn't be particularly hard to auto-detect. Peter E.
> can probably advocate more strongly for this approach.

Yeah, there used to be RPMs shipped that accidentally omitted readline
support.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-10-10 13:33:32 Re: Reword docs of feature "Remove temporary files after backend crash"
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-10-10 11:18:12 Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests