Re: parallel restore vs. windows

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore vs. windows
Date: 2008-12-24 22:58:29
Message-ID: 4952BE95.5000900@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> This version completes properly on Windows with the regression database.
>>
>>
>
> actually, this one doesn't apply cleanly on head
>

I will have a new patch a day or two after Christmas, which I hope will
be very close to being fully done.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2008-12-24 23:46:17 Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2008-12-24 22:11:15 Re: parallel restore vs. windows