Re: stat() vs cygwin

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: stat() vs cygwin
Date: 2008-12-19 03:58:52
Message-ID: 494B1BFC.3020300@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> I'm confused. There is a Cygwin member of buildfarm, working quite
>> happily. Can you point me to the exact patch in question, please? I
>> thought we resolved the matter of stat() ages ago.
>>
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4865F707.6010702%40x-ray.at
>
>

That patch is NOT about $subject. In fact, if you read that whole thread
you will see here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-06/msg00915.php that I
conducted a test on Cygwin and found it was not suffering from the
problem we fixed on WIN32.

AFAICT Reini's patch is about fixing OpenSSL and possibly some other
options on Cygwin. It was rejected because it had other problems, but is
not indicative of a fundamental problem on Cygwin. There is no reason I
am aware of that we should declare Cygwin no longer supported, no matter
how much its continued existence apparently annoys a few people :-) .

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rushabh Lathia 2008-12-19 04:14:57 Re: Function with defval returns error
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-12-19 03:09:00 Re: stat() vs cygwin