Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Date: 2008-12-15 21:58:10
Message-ID: 4946D2F2.9060908@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon,

> I've explained this twice now on different parts of this thread. Could I
> politely direct your attention to those posts?

Chill. I was just explaining that the *goal* of sync standby was not
complicated or really something to be argued about. It's pretty clear.

--Josh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-12-15 22:08:12 Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-12-15 21:55:44 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code