Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]
Date: 2010-01-10 16:53:30
Message-ID: 4943.1263142410@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:42, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I was checked where the string converted with "%ld" is used.
>> An especially fatal part is not found excluding one of plperl.

> I have not looked at the plperl stuff yet. I'd appreciate a comment
> from someone who knows plperl :-) Andrew, maybe?

I think I dealt with that already, if Tsutomu-san is speaking of the
prepared-query hash table keys in plperl and pltcl.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-01-10 17:40:54 Re: Streaming replication status
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-10 16:47:59 Re: ECPG patch causes warning