| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: benchmarking the query planner |
| Date: | 2008-12-11 23:47:51 |
| Message-ID: | 49415247.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't see
>> much value in a data-type-dependent default anyway
I am dubious about the value there, too, at least for our environment.
> I would prefer distinct type or domain specific defaults
Now that would be really useful.
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-12-11 23:50:19 | Re: benchmarking the query planner |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-12-11 23:44:04 | Re: benchmarking the query planner |