Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance]

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Liraz Siri <liraz(at)turnkeylinux(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance]
Date: 2008-12-10 08:11:23
Message-ID: 493F79AB.2030309@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure what the guidelines for listing on our downloads
> page ought to be, but I think we should have some. At minimum a
> representative on pgsql-packagers.

That should be OK for the time being. We do have a pgsql-packagers
"policy" at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Packagers that says that if
you produce proprietary things or don't keep up you will get dropped.
So that would prevent listing commercial or out-of-date downloads.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-12-10 08:14:49 Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance]
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-12-10 04:58:30 Re: Pootle server request